KEYCLOAK-1959 Role offline_access was effective only when explicitly added to user

This commit is contained in:
mposolda committed 2015-10-15 22:30:17 +02:00
1 parent 802a39b1ce
commit b4520baee5
2 files changed
+77 -1

No files matched your search

@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Set;
@@ -325,6 +327,21 @@ public class TokenManager {
}
}
}
// Add all roles specified in scope parameter directly into requestedRoles, even if they are available just through composite role
List<RoleModel> scopeRoles = new LinkedList<>();
for (String scopeParamPart : scopeParamRoles) {
RoleModel scopeParamRole = getRoleFromScopeParam(client.getRealm(), scopeParamPart);
if (scopeParamRole != null) {
for (RoleModel role : roles) {
if (role.hasRole(scopeParamRole)) {
scopeRoles.add(scopeParamRole);
}
}
}
}
roles.addAll(scopeRoles);
requestedRoles = roles;
}
@@ -341,6 +358,17 @@ public class TokenManager {
}
}
// For now, just use "roleName" for realm roles and "clientId/roleName" for client roles
private static RoleModel getRoleFromScopeParam(RealmModel realm, String scopeParamRole) {
String[] parts = scopeParamRole.split("/");
if (parts.length == 1) {
return realm.getRole(parts[0]);
} else {
ClientModel roleClient = realm.getClientByClientId(parts[0]);
return roleClient!=null ? roleClient.getRole(parts[1]) : null;
}
}
public void verifyAccess(AccessToken token, AccessToken newToken) throws OAuthErrorException {
if (token.getRealmAccess() != null) {
if (newToken.getRealmAccess() == null) throw new OAuthErrorException(OAuthErrorException.INVALID_SCOPE, "User no long has permission for realm roles");